2K Face Scan: 13 Photos Amazon Stores Indefinitely
2K Face Scan: 13 Photos Amazon Stores Indefinitely
This episode is based on our article:
Read the full article →2K Face Scan: 13 Photos Amazon Stores Indefinitely
Full Episode Transcript
You pointed your phone at your face to make a basketball avatar. Thirteen photos, a quick spin of your head, and there you were in the game. But according to a lawsuit filed against Amazon, those photos didn't just become a cartoon version of you. They became a permanent mathematical map of your actual face, sitting on Amazon's servers, possibly forever.
If you've ever scanned your face for a game, an
If you've ever scanned your face for a game, an app, or a filter, this is your story too. Because the thing you thought you were doing, making an avatar, was not the thing that actually happened. The real transaction was quieter, and it didn't end when you stopped playing. This one's worth understanding, because the fear people feel about face scanning usually comes from not knowing where the data goes. So let's follow it. When you scan your face for a game, where does it actually go, and why doesn't it come back?
Let's start with what a face scan really is. When the app takes those thirteen photos and asks you to slowly turn your head, it's not saving pictures. It's building a three-dimensional model, the exact geometry of your face, turned into numbers. The distance between your eyes, the curve of your cheekbones, the shape of your jaw. All of it becomes coordinates.
And here's the part most players never saw. According to the lawsuit, that data didn't stay with the game's publisher, Take-Two. It traveled to Amazon Web Services, a completely different company's cloud servers. Amazon's systems did the math that turned your photos into face geometry, and then stored it. So your face data ended up in a building you never chose, run by a company you never bought the game from. For the everyday person, that's the uncomfortable truth, your face went further than your game did.
Now, this technology fails constantly, and people blame themselves. But it's not you. The system needs near-perfect conditions. According to technical guides on the feature, poor lighting is the biggest cause of failed scans. You can only tilt your head to about forty-five degrees, go past that, or catch a shadow, and it rejects you. Even a small app update can invalidate a scan that worked yesterday, forcing you to upload your face all over again.
Every one of those retries
And every one of those retries? It's another capture. Another face model processed and stored. You never see those failed attempts pile up, but according to the lawsuit's claims, Amazon had no clear policy to delete this biometric data. So it may simply stay.
Picture handing a passport photo to a government office. You expect them to keep the photo. But imagine they also measured every contour of your face, converted it to a numeric profile, stored it indefinitely, and shipped copies to contractors down the street. You'd see your photo on your I.D. and assume the job was done. Meanwhile the profile that actually identifies you never left their files.
That's the misconception at the heart of all this. People believe if the avatar shows up and looks right, everything's fine. And that makes sense, you see the upload, the spinner, the finished face. The transaction feels closed. But a working avatar only proves the rendering succeeded. It tells you nothing about where the geometry lives, how long it stays, or who can reach it.
Here's the piece that changes everything. When you tried to delete your data, you probably meant "remove my avatar from the game." But the company's definition of deletion may be far narrower. The avatar was never the point. The permanent, identifiable map of your face, that was the real product, and it was never yours to see.
The Bottom Line
So let me put this simply. When you scan your face for a game, it becomes a set of numbers that describe your real face. Those numbers get stored on a company's cloud servers, sometimes a different company than the game itself. And deleting your avatar doesn't mean deleting that map.
Illinois has a law that lets people sue for up to five thousand dollars per violation when biometric data is mishandled, and Amazon settled a case over exactly this. Whether you're a lawyer reading privacy policies or a parent handing a phone to your kid, the lesson is the same, knowing where your face goes is the first step to controlling it. The full breakdown's in the show notes if you want to go deeper.
Ready for forensic-grade facial comparison?
Full forensic reports with detailed similarity scoring. Results in seconds.
Run My First SearchMore Episodes
Deepfake AI App: One Photo, 225,000 School Fakes
According to survey data from U.S. schools, as many as two hundred and twenty-five thousand deepfake nudes may have circulated in a single school year. Not of celebrities. Of ordinary students — kids in grades six through
PodcastDeepfake lawsuit: Grok turned a clothed photo into abuse
A photographer in Bentonville, Arkansas took a normal photo of a little girl. A professional shoot. She was fully dressed. Then someone fed that photo into an A.I. chatbot and typed a command to strip her clothes off. <br
PodcastAI Deepfake Laws: 15,736 Victims in Six Months
A middle school student in Henderson is now facing charges. Police say the student used artificial intelligence to create explicit fake images of classmates — and then shared them. Not a celebrity. Not a stranger online.
